Application root access
A côté de cet aspect en principe positif, rien n'empêcherait toutefois une personne malveillante d'exploiter cette même escalade de privilèges pour l'utiliser de façon nocive. Pour le fabricant OnePlus a-t-il laissé cette application en place dans ses smartphones?
Gestionnaire de fichiers pour Android : les meilleures apps - IONOS
Mais il pourrait toujours facilement apporter une correction en supprimant tout simplement l'application EngineerMode dans de futurs firmwares. Accueil Actualités Mobilité Android. Complément d'information.
- [RESOLU] super Su désinstallé: conséquence sur le root ?.
- Trois applications pour rooter Android sans PC.
- Rooter Android - Passer root sur Android.
- root application for android 5.4?
- Root d'Android.
Pour l'achat d'un OnePlus 7 ou OnePlus 7 Pro, le fabricant propose un système de reprise de votre ancien smartphone OnePlus ou d'autres marques. Vos commentaires. La bonne backdoor Dublab a écrit : Super Les gars valident la rom normal. I will try to explain some of the considerations we have to make when allowing to root your phone or not.
But first I need to explain a little more what we are talking about. For this discussion it is important to understand how application apps are installed, started and are prohibited from doing harmful things. Applications in Android are cryptographically signed by their author before they are put in the application store app store.
Menu de navigation
By doing so, the application installer will write the granted permissions in a location on the phone where the application itself is not allowed to write. This is intended to prevent an application from modifying its own permissions. In short, there are different applications on a running phone and the security model allow you to be able to put some trust in running an application: An application that does not have the permission to read contacts cannot read your contacts.
The digital signature also allows the developer to prove to the system that he is the original author and this grants him the permissions to update its own application. This is simply a mechanism that the Android developers created to prevent different applications to impersonate each other and to force applications to declare the permissions that they need. Another design choice of Android is to assume that the system partition can only be modified by performing a system update it puts more trust and privileges in applications installed there. The other partition, the data partition, will contain apps and data for applications downloaded via the app store.
The danger with this security model is that it assumes the above.
Gestionnaires de fichiers pour Android : les meilleures alternatives aux app standard
Applications like Superuser are specially designed to work around this model and they do this in such a way that application isolation is lost. Root access breaks the Android security model and hence should only be used with care. It is a bit like driving without a security belt or going mountain climbing without a safety line, it gives you more flexibility but is not a very wise thing to do. Secondly, companies like Google and application developers of security sensitive applications e.
The Android security model is designed to separate applications from each other and this is a good thing, specially when running banking apps next to less trustworthy apps on the same device. Companies like Google and application developers expect their code to run on a trustworthy device and will only provide their services on such devices.
Fairphone has made the conscious choice not to offer an option to root the device on its Google-services enabled software. That being said, we are working on a user-installable Google-free version of Android called Fairphone Open Source OS where we give more freedom to users. For this version we will make it easier for users to enable root access and install applications like SuperUser but will not include Google services.
We are working to have this open source user-installable version ready soon, but we are not announcing a timeline for launch yet. Thanks for your announcement. Several people have committed to Fairphone because they feel it gives them the freedom to open it up, and denying that freedom in the software side caused quite some uproar. From in there, I think the option to download a rooted or rootable image could be given.
After downloading that image, maybe enabling root access could be done with a switch somewhere in the settings. Ok, I understand that you made the decision, I also see that there are reasons why it was taken, though I personally see other reasons with at least similar importance, which would point towards a rooted FP2. But for the future I hope we can have a more open discussion on the rooting issue amongst the people who back the project. Or, much better, an option at first phone boot not sure if that is technically possible, but I guess software makes many things possible , where the user can decide which way to go.
I will for sure not put a new image on the phone for the time being, that is just too much configuration work after I set up the FP2 finally. All I wanted was the normal FP Onion 1. Next thing to do: open a Onion wish-list thread where we can write down all the things we would like from the non-rooted secure version of FP which we could have gained from apps that are rooted.
- duplicata facture telephone bouygues telecom;
- Vous avez aimé cet article ? Nous vous conseillons :?
- logiciel espion par mail gratuit;
Titanium backup does not work with the delivered OS, then we should get something of the same functionality working without having root. This will lead to fp2s with historic software versions, and I do not know whether that will be in your interest?
- application iphone localiser un portable!
- Base de connaissances.
- ecoute telephonique gueant?
- Activer ou désactiver l’utilisateur root.
- Gérer les permissions root avec l'application SuperSU.
- Rooter Android?
If this is it, it sucks… and I deeply regret my purchase because I thought it would be everything FP1 was and more… now I get less of what I need. Not sure if switching root to off really fully restores Androids security model. I am not sure I understand what you are implying, sorry. First I was disappointed that the FP2 did not come rooted as the FP1 did , but now it even cannot be rooted easily. After all what was publicly discussed about privacy and security I cannot believe that the Fairphone does not offer the concerned users a easy way to control their data in the way they want, without using 15 tools, compiler and so on.
What I want to say is: this decision is a bit more than just about security within the android system - it also gives an indication on who should own phone and data. It basically says that you guys believe that most of the FP users are not fit to act responsibly or not intelligent enough to control their data and therefore are better forced to use the normal environment, which is far from ideal. But I think it is good to look at this issue from different perspectives.
Maybe there is a way if more users support this to rediscuss this decision. Not only because of making my life easier, but in order to give a clear statement that the FP2 enables the user to get full control. Hi, you understood me correctly. On the one hand, it means I will switch back to my old phone until fp-osos is ready to be installed. Just when I was ready to really port everything to the FP2. Secondly, I have seen several times already that you really need a decent sized community to be able to maintain such a fork.
Splitting up the efforts of the FP team is a risky path. If the this is pulled off correctly however, it would be an even better option than installing Cyanogenmod.